| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|\ |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is in 0.4.4 but let's backport it so we can stable it quickly.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/930539
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This reverts commit ca877f01a331bd239db8b6878c7f92fa85e02dae.
Unfortunately, the CMake developers learned of Homebrew doing this
and decided to "block" this functionality because they felt it was abuse.
We now have to implement a "provider" instead...
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/920846
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Also, drop obsolete register hack. As far as I can tell, it was either
misguided from the beginning or is at the very least now-obsolete. The
function (or lack) of 'register' in C is a misnomer anyway.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/935364
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Straight-to-stable, minor bugfix release to yesterday's version
that is also stable.
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
See patch header.
Tempting to revbump, albeit will still spare users for now. Will
at least give stable users the fixed vresion when stabilized soon.
~testing users annoyed by this are invited to manually rebuild.
Also add to 6.7.9999 so it is not forgotten with 6.7.3, "currently"
not marked to be picked to the 6.7 branch for the 6.7.3 release
and may or may not still be needed until 6.8.0.
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/935377
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/935046
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/930539
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Matt Jolly <kangie@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Matt Jolly <kangie@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Matt Jolly <kangie@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Matt Jolly <kangie@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Matt Jolly <kangie@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Matt Jolly <kangie@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Matt Jolly <kangie@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Matt Jolly <kangie@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Matt Jolly <kangie@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Matt Jolly <kangie@gentoo.org>
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: James Le Cuirot <chewi@gentoo.org>
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@gentoo.org>
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This flag still needs to be enabled, but we will now force the flag on
in the amd64 profile instead. Due to PMS limitations, the BDEPEND
appropach prevents other architectures from building gcc for amd64.
We may drop the flag eventually now that wider x86 support is being
backed out, but binutils currently still enables it.
No revbumps required because this only changes BDEPEND.
Signed-off-by: James Le Cuirot <chewi@gentoo.org>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
gcc needs this flag enabled, and up till now, we've enforced this with
BDEPEND. However, this prevents other architectures from building gcc
for amd64 due to PMS limitations.
We may drop the flag eventually now that wider x86 support is being
backed out, but binutils currently still enables it.
Signed-off-by: James Le Cuirot <chewi@gentoo.org>
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org>
|