| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="ppc64"
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="ppc"
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/650808
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/631890
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/643698
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="arm"
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6_p81
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/646354
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6_p81
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/649914
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/641382
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --force
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The corresponding Vuze ebuild was dropped.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="amd64"
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="amd64"
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="amd64"
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="amd64"
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"dev" is the branch where development actually happens so its use is more in line with expectations for a -9999 version.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/520070
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/555082
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/643994
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/644312
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Among other things, this version seems to fix Bug #647558.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/644704
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/647558
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/647568
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/647568
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/643636
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/7092
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|