1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
|
Make TIFFPrintDirectory cope with both TIFF_VARIABLE and TIFF_VARIABLE2
conventions for field_passcount fields, ie, either 16- or 32-bit counts.
This patch is taken from upstream commits dated 2012-05-23 ("fix crash
with odd 16bit count types for some custom fields") and 2012-12-12 ("Fix
TIFF_VARIABLE/TIFF_VARIABLE2 confusion in TIFFPrintDirectory").
This doesn't qualify as a security issue in itself, mainly because
TIFFPrintDirectory is unlikely to be used in any security-exposed
scenarios; but we need to fix it so that our test case for CVE-2012-5581
works on all platforms.
diff -Naur tiff-3.9.4.orig/libtiff/tif_print.c tiff-3.9.4/libtiff/tif_print.c
--- tiff-3.9.4.orig/libtiff/tif_print.c 2010-06-08 14:50:42.000000000 -0400
+++ tiff-3.9.4/libtiff/tif_print.c 2012-12-13 12:17:33.726765771 -0500
@@ -518,8 +518,19 @@
continue;
if(fip->field_passcount) {
- if(TIFFGetField(tif, tag, &value_count, &raw_data) != 1)
+ if (fip->field_readcount == TIFF_VARIABLE2 ) {
+ if(TIFFGetField(tif, tag, &value_count, &raw_data) != 1)
+ continue;
+ } else if (fip->field_readcount == TIFF_VARIABLE ) {
+ uint16 small_value_count;
+ if(TIFFGetField(tif, tag, &small_value_count, &raw_data) != 1)
+ continue;
+ value_count = small_value_count;
+ } else {
+ assert (fip->field_readcount == TIFF_VARIABLE
+ || fip->field_readcount == TIFF_VARIABLE2);
continue;
+ }
} else {
if (fip->field_readcount == TIFF_VARIABLE
|| fip->field_readcount == TIFF_VARIABLE2)
|