www-client/chromium: dev channel bump to 93.0.4577.8

Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/803260
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/769989
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.20, Repoman-3.0.2
Signed-off-by: Stephan Hartmann <sultan@gentoo.org>

1 files changed, 79 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/www-client/chromium/files/chromium-93-EnumTable-crash.patch b/www-client/chromium/files/chromium-93-EnumTable-crash.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a5c2defa0ae2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/www-client/chromium/files/chromium-93-EnumTable-crash.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+diff --git a/components/cast_channel/enum_table.h b/components/cast_channel/enum_table.h
+index a63ae86..83ada65 100644
+--- a/components/cast_channel/enum_table.h
++++ b/components/cast_channel/enum_table.h
+@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
+ #include <cstdint>
+ #include <cstring>
+ #include <ostream>
++#include <vector>
+ 
+ #include "base/check_op.h"
+ #include "base/macros.h"
+@@ -213,7 +214,7 @@ class
+ 
+   template <typename E>
+   friend class EnumTable;
+-  DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(GenericEnumTableEntry);
++  DISALLOW_ASSIGN(GenericEnumTableEntry);
+ };
+ 
+ // Yes, these constructors really needs to be inlined.  Even though they look
+@@ -251,8 +252,7 @@ class EnumTable {
+     // Constructor for regular entries.
+     constexpr Entry(E value, base::StringPiece str)
+         : GenericEnumTableEntry(static_cast<int32_t>(value), str) {}
+-
+-    DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(Entry);
++    DISALLOW_ASSIGN(Entry);
+   };
+ 
+   static_assert(sizeof(E) <= sizeof(int32_t),
+@@ -307,15 +307,14 @@ class EnumTable {
+     if (is_sorted_) {
+       const std::size_t index = static_cast<std::size_t>(value);
+       if (ANALYZER_ASSUME_TRUE(index < data_.size())) {
+-        const auto& entry = data_.begin()[index];
++        const auto& entry = data_[index];
+         if (ANALYZER_ASSUME_TRUE(entry.has_str()))
+           return entry.str();
+       }
+       return absl::nullopt;
+     }
+     return GenericEnumTableEntry::FindByValue(
+-        reinterpret_cast<const GenericEnumTableEntry*>(data_.begin()),
+-        data_.size(), static_cast<int32_t>(value));
++        &data_[0], data_.size(), static_cast<int32_t>(value));
+   }
+ 
+   // This overload of GetString is designed for cases where the argument is a
+@@ -343,8 +342,7 @@ class EnumTable {
+   // enum value directly.
+   absl::optional<E> GetEnum(base::StringPiece str) const {
+     auto* entry = GenericEnumTableEntry::FindByString(
+-        reinterpret_cast<const GenericEnumTableEntry*>(data_.begin()),
+-        data_.size(), str);
++        &data_[0], data_.size(), str);
+     return entry ? static_cast<E>(entry->value) : absl::optional<E>();
+   }
+ 
+@@ -359,7 +357,7 @@ class EnumTable {
+   // Align the data on a cache line boundary.
+   alignas(64)
+ #endif
+-      std::initializer_list<Entry> data_;
++      const std::vector<Entry> data_;
+   bool is_sorted_;
+ 
+   constexpr EnumTable(std::initializer_list<Entry> data, bool is_sorted)
+@@ -371,8 +369,8 @@ class EnumTable {
+ 
+     for (std::size_t i = 0; i < data.size(); i++) {
+       for (std::size_t j = i + 1; j < data.size(); j++) {
+-        const Entry& ei = data.begin()[i];
+-        const Entry& ej = data.begin()[j];
++        const Entry& ei = data[i];
++        const Entry& ej = data[j];
+         DCHECK(ei.value != ej.value)
+             << "Found duplicate enum values at indices " << i << " and " << j;
+         DCHECK(!(ei.has_str() && ej.has_str() && ei.str() == ej.str()))